HISTORICAL COACHING DATABASE
THE HISTORY. THE GAPS.
1655COACH PROFILES
8736RATED CANDIDATE SEASONS
COVERAGE BY SCHOOL
“Single candidate” means one coach appears in the source table for that year; it does not certify game-level attribution. Split years require further review. Some single-candidate seasons still lack entering AP evidence and therefore have no Coach FR.
| SCHOOL | ELIGIBLE SEASONS | SINGLE CANDIDATE | SPLIT YEARS | COACH FR SEASONS |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Air ForceSource-table candidates across eligible years | 69 | 69 | 0 | 69 |
| AkronMissing assignment years: 2023, 2024, 2025 | 39 | 35 | 1 | 35 |
| AlabamaSource-table candidates across eligible years | 89 | 87 | 2 | 86 |
| Appalachian StateSource-table candidates across eligible years | 22 | 20 | 2 | 21 |
| ArizonaSource-table candidates across eligible years | 88 | 86 | 2 | 85 |
| Arizona StateSource-table candidates across eligible years | 85 | 83 | 2 | 83 |
| ArkansasSource-table candidates across eligible years | 90 | 85 | 5 | 85 |
| Arkansas StateSource-table candidates across eligible years | 43 | 40 | 3 | 41 |
| ArmySource-table candidates across eligible years | 90 | 89 | 1 | 88 |
| AuburnSource-table candidates across eligible years | 89 | 85 | 4 | 85 |
| Ball StateSource-table candidates across eligible years | 53 | 51 | 2 | 51 |
| BaylorMissing assignment years: 2021, 2022, 2023, 2024, 2025 | 88 | 83 | 0 | 88 |
| Boise StateMissing assignment years: 1996, 1997, 1998, 1999, 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023, 2024, 2025 | 30 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Boston CollegeSource-table candidates across eligible years | 90 | 88 | 2 | 87 |
| Bowling GreenSource-table candidates across eligible years | 65 | 65 | 0 | 65 |
| BuffaloSource-table candidates across eligible years | 36 | 10 | 26 | 16 |
| BYUSource-table candidates across eligible years | 87 | 87 | 0 | 87 |
| CaliforniaSource-table candidates across eligible years | 90 | 89 | 1 | 89 |
| Central MichiganSource-table candidates across eligible years | 51 | 49 | 2 | 50 |
| CharlotteSource-table candidates across eligible years | 11 | 8 | 3 | 8 |
| CincinnatiSource-table candidates across eligible years | 80 | 76 | 4 | 78 |
| ClemsonSource-table candidates across eligible years | 90 | 87 | 3 | 87 |
| Coastal CarolinaSource-table candidates across eligible years | 9 | 7 | 2 | 7 |
| ColoradoSource-table candidates across eligible years | 90 | 90 | 0 | 90 |
| Colorado StateSource-table candidates across eligible years | 88 | 84 | 4 | 84 |
| DelawareSource-table candidates across eligible years | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| DukeSource-table candidates across eligible years | 90 | 89 | 1 | 88 |
| East CarolinaMissing assignment years: 1970, 1974, 1975, 1976, 1977, 1978, 1979 | 64 | 56 | 1 | 56 |
| Eastern MichiganSource-table candidates across eligible years | 50 | 45 | 5 | 45 |
| Florida AtlanticSource-table candidates across eligible years | 22 | 19 | 3 | 20 |
| FIUSource-table candidates across eligible years | 21 | 20 | 1 | 20 |
| FloridaSource-table candidates across eligible years | 89 | 82 | 7 | 82 |
| Florida StateSource-table candidates across eligible years | 71 | 68 | 3 | 68 |
| Fresno StateSource-table candidates across eligible years | 57 | 54 | 3 | 55 |
| GeorgiaSource-table candidates across eligible years | 90 | 90 | 0 | 89 |
| Georgia SouthernSource-table candidates across eligible years | 12 | 9 | 3 | 10 |
| Georgia StateSource-table candidates across eligible years | 13 | 12 | 1 | 12 |
| Georgia TechSource-table candidates across eligible years | 90 | 86 | 4 | 85 |
| HawaiiSource-table candidates across eligible years | 53 | 52 | 1 | 52 |
| HoustonSource-table candidates across eligible years | 76 | 72 | 4 | 72 |
| IllinoisSource-table candidates across eligible years | 90 | 87 | 3 | 87 |
| IndianaSource-table candidates across eligible years | 90 | 89 | 1 | 89 |
| IowaMissing assignment years: 1936, 1943, 1944 | 90 | 87 | 0 | 87 |
| Iowa StateSource-table candidates across eligible years | 90 | 88 | 2 | 88 |
| Jacksonville StateSource-table candidates across eligible years | 3 | 2 | 1 | 3 |
| James MadisonSource-table candidates across eligible years | 4 | 3 | 1 | 4 |
| KansasSource-table candidates across eligible years | 90 | 88 | 2 | 88 |
| Kansas StateSource-table candidates across eligible years | 90 | 88 | 2 | 89 |
| Kennesaw StateSource-table candidates across eligible years | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| Kent StateMissing assignment years: 1998, 1999, 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023, 2024, 2025 | 64 | 36 | 0 | 36 |
| KentuckySource-table candidates across eligible years | 89 | 89 | 0 | 89 |
| LibertySource-table candidates across eligible years | 8 | 8 | 0 | 8 |
| LouisianaSource-table candidates across eligible years | 55 | 54 | 1 | 55 |
| Louisiana TechMissing assignment years: 1999, 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006 | 48 | 39 | 1 | 39 |
| LouisvilleSource-table candidates across eligible years | 65 | 63 | 2 | 64 |
| LSUSource-table candidates across eligible years | 90 | 85 | 5 | 85 |
| MarshallSource-table candidates across eligible years | 49 | 48 | 1 | 48 |
| MarylandMissing assignment years: 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023, 2024, 2025 | 90 | 80 | 0 | 89 |
| MemphisSource-table candidates across eligible years | 66 | 63 | 3 | 63 |
| Miami (FL)Source-table candidates across eligible years | 83 | 80 | 3 | 79 |
| Miami (OH)Source-table candidates across eligible years | 70 | 68 | 2 | 67 |
| MichiganSource-table candidates across eligible years | 90 | 88 | 2 | 89 |
| Michigan StateMissing assignment years: 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023, 2024, 2025 | 89 | 64 | 2 | 67 |
| Middle TennesseeSource-table candidates across eligible years | 27 | 27 | 0 | 27 |
| MinnesotaSource-table candidates across eligible years | 90 | 88 | 2 | 88 |
| Mississippi StateSource-table candidates across eligible years | 89 | 86 | 3 | 86 |
| MissouriSource-table candidates across eligible years | 90 | 90 | 0 | 90 |
| Missouri StateSource-table candidates across eligible years | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| NavySource-table candidates across eligible years | 90 | 88 | 2 | 87 |
| NC StateSource-table candidates across eligible years | 90 | 89 | 1 | 89 |
| NebraskaSource-table candidates across eligible years | 90 | 89 | 1 | 88 |
| NevadaSource-table candidates across eligible years | 44 | 43 | 1 | 43 |
| New MexicoSource-table candidates across eligible years | 90 | 89 | 1 | 89 |
| New Mexico StateSource-table candidates across eligible years | 79 | 79 | 0 | 77 |
| North CarolinaSource-table candidates across eligible years | 90 | 88 | 2 | 87 |
| North Dakota StateSource-table candidates across eligible years | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| North TexasSource-table candidates across eligible years | 56 | 52 | 4 | 52 |
| Northern IllinoisSource-table candidates across eligible years | 57 | 55 | 2 | 56 |
| NorthwesternSource-table candidates across eligible years | 90 | 90 | 0 | 90 |
| Notre DameSource-table candidates across eligible years | 90 | 87 | 3 | 87 |
| OhioSource-table candidates across eligible years | 67 | 65 | 2 | 65 |
| Ohio StateSource-table candidates across eligible years | 90 | 89 | 1 | 89 |
| OklahomaSource-table candidates across eligible years | 90 | 89 | 1 | 88 |
| Oklahoma StateSource-table candidates across eligible years | 90 | 89 | 1 | 88 |
| Old DominionSource-table candidates across eligible years | 11 | 11 | 0 | 11 |
| Ole MissSource-table candidates across eligible years | 89 | 86 | 3 | 87 |
| OregonSource-table candidates across eligible years | 88 | 86 | 2 | 87 |
| Oregon StateSource-table candidates across eligible years | 88 | 85 | 3 | 86 |
| Penn StateSource-table candidates across eligible years | 90 | 88 | 2 | 88 |
| PittsburghSource-table candidates across eligible years | 90 | 84 | 6 | 84 |
| PurdueSource-table candidates across eligible years | 90 | 87 | 3 | 88 |
| RiceSource-table candidates across eligible years | 90 | 90 | 0 | 89 |
| RutgersMissing assignment years: 2021, 2022, 2023, 2024, 2025 | 81 | 74 | 2 | 79 |
| Sacramento StateSource-table candidates across eligible years | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Sam HoustonSource-table candidates across eligible years | 3 | 2 | 1 | 2 |
| San Diego StateSource-table candidates across eligible years | 57 | 57 | 0 | 57 |
| San Jose StateSource-table candidates across eligible years | 76 | 74 | 2 | 74 |
| SMUSource-table candidates across eligible years | 88 | 86 | 2 | 85 |
| South AlabamaSource-table candidates across eligible years | 14 | 14 | 0 | 14 |
| South CarolinaSource-table candidates across eligible years | 90 | 88 | 2 | 88 |
| South FloridaMissing assignment years: 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023, 2024, 2025 | 26 | 19 | 1 | 19 |
| Southern MissSource-table candidates across eligible years | 65 | 62 | 3 | 62 |
| StanfordSource-table candidates across eligible years | 87 | 87 | 0 | 87 |
| SyracuseSource-table candidates across eligible years | 89 | 89 | 0 | 89 |
| TCUSource-table candidates across eligible years | 90 | 87 | 3 | 86 |
| TempleSource-table candidates across eligible years | 73 | 69 | 4 | 70 |
| TennesseeSource-table candidates across eligible years | 89 | 86 | 3 | 85 |
| TexasSource-table candidates across eligible years | 90 | 90 | 0 | 90 |
| Texas A&MMissing assignment years: 1954, 1955, 1956, 1957 | 90 | 81 | 5 | 80 |
| Texas StateSource-table candidates across eligible years | 14 | 13 | 1 | 13 |
| Texas TechSource-table candidates across eligible years | 90 | 85 | 5 | 84 |
| ToledoSource-table candidates across eligible years | 64 | 61 | 3 | 62 |
| TroySource-table candidates across eligible years | 25 | 23 | 2 | 23 |
| TulaneSource-table candidates across eligible years | 90 | 87 | 3 | 88 |
| TulsaMissing assignment years: 1970, 1971, 2025 | 90 | 86 | 1 | 85 |
| UABSource-table candidates across eligible years | 28 | 27 | 1 | 27 |
| UCFSource-table candidates across eligible years | 30 | 28 | 2 | 28 |
| UCLASource-table candidates across eligible years | 90 | 84 | 6 | 84 |
| UConnSource-table candidates across eligible years | 25 | 22 | 3 | 22 |
| ULMSource-table candidates across eligible years | 42 | 41 | 1 | 41 |
| UMassSource-table candidates across eligible years | 14 | 12 | 2 | 12 |
| UNLVSource-table candidates across eligible years | 48 | 47 | 1 | 48 |
| USCSource-table candidates across eligible years | 90 | 87 | 3 | 86 |
| UtahSource-table candidates across eligible years | 90 | 90 | 0 | 90 |
| Utah StateSource-table candidates across eligible years | 89 | 87 | 2 | 87 |
| UTEPSource-table candidates across eligible years | 87 | 83 | 4 | 83 |
| UTSASource-table candidates across eligible years | 14 | 14 | 0 | 14 |
| VanderbiltSource-table candidates across eligible years | 90 | 90 | 0 | 88 |
| VirginiaSource-table candidates across eligible years | 90 | 90 | 0 | 89 |
| Virginia TechSource-table candidates across eligible years | 88 | 84 | 4 | 84 |
| Wake ForestSource-table candidates across eligible years | 90 | 90 | 0 | 90 |
| WashingtonSource-table candidates across eligible years | 90 | 88 | 2 | 89 |
| Washington StateSource-table candidates across eligible years | 88 | 85 | 3 | 86 |
| West VirginiaSource-table candidates across eligible years | 90 | 89 | 1 | 89 |
| Western KentuckySource-table candidates across eligible years | 18 | 16 | 2 | 17 |
| Western MichiganSource-table candidates across eligible years | 64 | 64 | 0 | 64 |
| WisconsinSource-table candidates across eligible years | 90 | 88 | 2 | 88 |
| WyomingSource-table candidates across eligible years | 87 | 87 | 0 | 87 |
Tenure source facts: Wikipedia, CC BY-SA 4.0. Original article links are retained on coach profiles. FR is calculated by CFBFR. Earliest incomplete poll evidence and shared seasons are withheld rather than treated as zero.
BACK TO COACHES ↗